Connect with us

Technology

Acquisitions Beyond IT Dominated the News in 2025

Unknown's avatar

Published

on

Acquisitions Beyond IT Dominated the News in 2025

Federal IT and Acquisition Landscape in 2025

Unprecedented Turnover in CIO Positions

In the past year, nearly 85% of chief information officers (CIOs) within CFO Act agencies have departed, marking an unprecedented turnover in the federal technology community. This shake-up raises concerns about continuity and long-term strategy in federal IT and acquisition efforts, especially as these roles play critical parts in driving technology innovation and operational efficiency.

Modest Federal Policy Developments

In 2025, federal technology and cybersecurity policy under the Trump administration has been relatively modest. Instead of sweeping reforms, the focus has shifted toward federal acquisition, overshadowing broader tech discussions. This focus on acquisition involves numerous stories, like the significant overhaul of the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) and the Senate confirmation of Kevin Rhodes as administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy.

Key Voices in the Discussion

To delve deeper into the implications of these changes, the Federal News Network assembled a panel of former federal executives. Their insights illuminate the standout developments in federal IT and acquisition over the past year:

  • Jonathan Alboum, federal CTO at ServiceNow and former CIO of the Agriculture Department.
  • Melvin Brown, VP at CANI and former deputy CIO at OPM.
  • Matthew Cornelius, managing director at Workday and former OMB staffer.
  • Kevin Cummins, partner at Franklin Square Group and former Senate staffer.
  • Michael Derrios, executive director at George Mason University’s Baroni Center and former senior procurement executive at the State Department.
  • Julie Dunne, principal at Monument Advocacy and former GSA Federal Acquisition Service commissioner.
  • Mike Hettinger, founding principal at Hettinger Strategy Group and former House staff member.
  • Nancy Sieger, partner at Guidehouse and former IRS CIO.

Accomplishments in Federal IT and Acquisition

1. Enhanced Collaboration with Commercial Software Leaders

Matthew Cornelius highlighted a pivotal change led by the administration—a concerted effort to engage directly with leaders in commercial off-the-shelf software. This initiative has not only reduced costs but has also fostered clearer communication regarding product capabilities, ultimately enhancing mission readiness and global competitiveness among government agencies.

2. Adoption of Human Capital Management Solutions

The Department of Energy became the first cabinet-level agency to adopt a true human capital management SaaS solution, showcasing federal readiness to embrace SaaS models that meet stringent security and functional requirements. This monumental step illustrates the accelerating pace of digitization in federal operations, promising to enhance mission readiness substantially.

3. Governance Framework for AI Procurement

Melvin Brown pointed out the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) shift from policy discussions about artificial intelligence toward actionable governance through comprehensive documentation and evaluation frameworks. The introduction of these “AI procurement guardrails” sets industry standards and helps agencies navigate the unique challenges posed by AI technologies.

4. Revolutionizing Federal Acquisition Regulations

The recent overhaul of FAR, noted by several panelists, stands as a significant milestone for easing procurement processes. Although the benefits may not be immediate, these reforms aim to enhance efficiency in agencies’ technology acquisition, promoting a more agile response to evolving mission requirements.

Surprising Progress and Adaptation

FedRAMP 20x Initiative

Nancy Sieger expressed astonishment at the FedRAMP 20x initiative’s bold reimagining of the longstanding federal cloud authorization process. By moving toward a cloud-native and automation-driven model, GSA’s leadership has initiated radical changes in how federal agencies approach cybersecurity, indicating that a cultural shift toward transparency is not just possible, but attainable.

Department of Defense’s CMMC 2.0

Michael Derrios emphasized the launch of CMMC 2.0 by the Department of Defense (DoD) as a transformative step shaping acquisition strategies and enhancing supply-chain resilience. This certification not only highlights capable sources for procurement but also creates practical tools for risk reduction in government operations.

Challenges Ahead

Despite a year of notable advancements, challenges loom large as federal agencies grapple with significant personnel losses due to early retirements and voluntary departures. As Kevin Cummins noted, the acquisition workforce’s ability to modernize federal systems may be hampered, potentially leading to complications in upcoming IT upgrades.

Complexity in Technology Governance

Jonathan Alboum raised concerns about the increasing complexity in government technology acquisitions. The interplay between emerging technologies, cybersecurity imperatives, and procurement reforms underscores the necessity for robust governance frameworks to prevent issues like technology sprawl and unmanageable threats.

AI Adoption Woes

The excitement surrounding AI’s potential in federal operations is tempered by readiness gaps. Melvin Brown expressed concerns about the need for appropriate governance, quality data, and lucid policy frameworks as agencies push forward with AI deployments. These issues need urgent attention to ensure effective integration into mission-critical processes.

Conclusion

As 2025 draws to a close, the federal IT and acquisition landscape is marked by significant accomplishments alongside daunting challenges. The evolution of governance structures, along with innovative approaches to procurement, marks a transformative period that influences both policy and operational efficiency across federal agencies. The panel’s insights underscore the necessity for continued adaptation and strategic foresight as agencies navigate the complexities of modern technology and procurement needs.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Technology

Evaluating the Valuation of Gorilla Technology Group (GRRR) Following the US$1.4 Billion AI Data Center Partnership Announcement

Unknown's avatar

Published

on

Evaluating the Valuation of Gorilla Technology Group (GRRR) Following the US.4 Billion AI Data Center Partnership Announcement

Find winning stocks in any market cycle. Join 7 million investors using Simply Wall St’s investing ideas for FREE.

Gorilla Technology Group (GRRR) has recently garnered attention due to its announcement of a substantial partnership worth US$1.4 billion. This multi-year agreement is set to facilitate the deployment of AI-ready data centers across Southeast Asia. Additionally, Gorilla has achieved notable wins in the realms of AI-driven public safety and infrastructure projects in Taiwan, marking a significant milestone in its expansion efforts.

See our latest analysis for Gorilla Technology Group.

Following this announcement, Gorilla’s stock experienced a remarkable surge, reflecting a one-day share price return of 12.36% and a seven-day return of 7.89%. However, investors should be cautious as the three-year total shareholder return is notably negative at -81.75%, indicating that long-term holders have faced considerable volatility and disappointing outcomes. This stark contrast prompts further examination of the company’s future trajectory.

If Gorilla’s shift toward AI is piquing your interest, it may be an opportune moment to diversify your investment watchlist. Consider exploring other high-growth technology and AI companies available through our high growth tech and AI stocks.

With the current stock price at US$14.09, coupled with the recent growth, a significant drop in total returns over three years, and a price target suggesting an upside of US$35, investors are left wondering if there is real value or if the market has already factored in anticipated growth.

The closing share price of US$14.09 juxtaposed with the widely referenced fair value of US$36.50 highlights a significant gap that is highly reliant on optimistic growth and margin projections. This disparity raises critical questions about the company’s future performance and market perception.

As Gorilla shifts from a project-based revenue model to more predictable, long-term recurring revenue contracts, alongside enhancements in its product/service offering and a goal to normalize gross margins to 40%, the outlook for greater earnings visibility and higher margins appears promising for the coming years.

Curious about the revenue growth, margin adjustments, and valuation multiples that support the US$36.50 fair value projection? The complete narrative elaborates on the growth trajectory, anticipated profit resets, and necessary discount rates for the current price to align with forecasted values.

Result: Fair Value of $36.5 (UNDERVALUED)

Have a read of the narrative in full and understand what’s behind the forecasts.

While the outlook seems positive, it’s crucial to recognize that delays in securing large government contracts or infused equity diluting existing shareholder value could alter the narrative dramatically. Investors must remain vigilant in monitoring such developments.

Find out about the key risks to this Gorilla Technology Group narrative.

For those who prefer a hands-on approach to analysis, building your own narrative can be straightforward. Start with this tool for a personalized investment narrative.

A great starting point for your Gorilla Technology Group research is our analysis highlighting 3 key rewards and 1 important warning sign that could impact your investment decision.

If Gorilla has piqued your interest, do not stop there. Use the Simply Wall St Screener to uncover more stocks that align with your investment style and goals.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology, and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, nor does it consider your individual objectives or financial situation. We aim to deliver long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Please note that our analysis may not incorporate the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Companies discussed in this article include GRRR.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

Continue Reading

Technology

Strengthening MIT’s Ties with Japan | MIT News

Unknown's avatar

Published

on

Strengthening MIT’s Ties with Japan | MIT News

Christine Pilcavage: Bridging Cultures through MISTI Japan

Born and raised in Japan as part of a military family, Christine Pilcavage understands deeply the transformative power of cultural immersion and exploration. Her life experiences have taken her across various countries, including Cambodia, the Philippines, and Kenya. “Any experience in a different context improves an individual,” she emphasizes, showcasing her belief in the value of diverse perspectives.

MISTI Japan: A Portal to Opportunities

As the managing director of MISTI Japan (MIT International Science and Technology Initiatives), Pilcavage plays a pivotal role in connecting MIT students and faculty with collaborators in Japan. The program offers students unparalleled opportunities through internships and research initiatives. By organizing cultural activities such as Ikebana classes and the Japanese Film Festival during MIT’s Independent Activities Period, she fosters a richer understanding of Japanese culture on campus.

MIT’s historical links with Japan are profound, dating back to 1874 when the first Japanese student graduated. The establishment of the MIT Association of Japan in 1911 marked the beginning of trans-Pacific alumni connections, which later evolved into the MIT Club of Japan. These roots highlight the long-standing relationship between MIT and Japan.

Immersive Experiences Shaping Future Leaders

The MIT-Japan Program, founded in 1981, was established to prepare MIT students to become forward-thinking scientists and engineers proficient in working within the Japanese context. Since its launch in 1983, students have participated in three to twelve-month internships, immersing themselves in a vastly different culture. “Japan is so different from the Western world,” Pilcavage notes, pointing out nuances in communication, like how verbs end sentences in Japanese, emphasizing the need for patience and keen listening.

Pilcavage advocates for the immense benefits of broadening one’s horizons beyond the familiar MIT environment and the United States. Traveling internationally cultivates diverse viewpoints, promotes innovative problem-solving, enhances language proficiency, and nurtures effective communication skills.

Cultural Resilience and Language Learning

One standout aspect of the program is its focus on cultural resilience. Pilcavage believes that engaging with local populations not only enriches student experiences but also supports them in learning differently. “We want our students to think and create,” she asserts, emphasizing the importance of viewing challenges through different cultural lenses.

MIT students actively contribute to their host communities through programs designed for rural Japanese kids, teaching STEM subjects in Japanese. This initiative, which has been ongoing since 2017, equips students with valuable skills while deepening their understanding of cultural subtleties, such as body language tailored to Japanese contexts.

A Multifaceted Journey to MIT

Pilcavage’s background is as diverse as her interests. She holds master’s degrees in both international affairs and public health, alongside an undergraduate study in economics and psychology. Her professional journey includes work with USAID, the Japanese government, JICA, and the World Health Organization, focusing on global health and educational challenges across Africa and Asia.

Her initial foray into Cambridge, Massachusetts, was driven by a quest for practical experience in public health. Pilcavage joined Management Sciences for Health, investigating reproductive issues and supporting Japanese NGOs. Her personal ties to MIT have deepened over the years—she even married an MIT alum in the MIT Chapel!

Commitment to Global Development

Throughout her career, Pilcavage has emphasized the importance of problem-solving in real-world contexts. During her early years at MIT, she managed the Comprehensive Initiative on Technology Evaluation (CITE), which evaluated low-cost interventions for communities living in poverty. “It’s important to learn how to manage real-world challenges effectively,” she notes, reinforcing her role in fostering collaborative environments for innovation.

Her dedication to promoting positive relations between the United States and Japan has not gone unnoticed. She has received accolades such as the Foreign Minister’s Commendation from the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the John E. Thayer III Award from the Japan Society of Boston.

Future Initiatives and Ongoing Impact

Today, Pilcavage remains passionate about the future of MISTI Japan. She is excited about new initiatives, including the upcoming global classroom project that will allow students to explore Japanese history and culture firsthand. These experiences in cities like Kyoto and Hiroshima aim to deepen students’ understanding and appreciation of Japan’s rich heritage.

Her constant questioning—“How can I make the program better?”—illustrates her dedication to continuous improvement for MISTI Japan. “I tell people I have the best job in the world,” she states, relishing the opportunity to share her culture with the MIT community while collaborating with supportive colleagues.

Through her efforts and leadership, Pilcavage is not just creating pathways for exploration but is also fostering a profound appreciation for cultural connections among the next generation of innovators and leaders.

Continue Reading

Technology

Elon Musk’s X to Prevent Grok from Analyzing Images of Real Individuals

Unknown's avatar

Published

on

Elon Musk’s X to Prevent Grok from Analyzing Images of Real Individuals

Elon Musk’s Grok Faces Scrutiny: AI and the Dangers of Deepfakes

Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence tool, Grok, has been in the spotlight following its controversial ability to create edited images of real people, particularly depicting them in revealing clothing. Recent developments have sparked discussions about legality, ethics, and user accountability, highlighting the increasing concern over the implications of AI-generated content.

Changes Announced by X

In a recent announcement on social media platform X (formerly Twitter), Musk’s team revealed that Grok would no longer have the capability to manipulate images of real individuals to present them in a sexualized manner, especially in jurisdictions where such practices are deemed illegal. The statement read, “We have implemented technological measures to prevent the Grok account from allowing the editing of images of real people in revealing clothing.” This decision came in light of growing public and governmental pressure to reign in the use of these AI capabilities.

Government Reactions

The UK government expressed a sense of validation following Grok’s new policy. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer had previously urged X to take action to manage AI tools responsibly. Reacting to the announcement, a spokesperson from UK regulator Ofcom described the change as a “welcome development,” yet clarified that their investigation into whether the platform violated UK laws continues. Technology Secretary Liz Kendall underscored the importance of establishing firm facts through Ofcom’s ongoing inquiry.

Legal Investigations in California

Adding to the mounting scrutiny, California’s Attorney General announced an investigation into the proliferation of sexualized AI deepfakes, particularly those that could involve minors. This investigation indicates a growing inclination among authorities to address AI-generated content’s potential harms, revealing the urgency behind the need for regulation in the rapidly evolving tech landscape.

User Restrictions and Accountability

In their statement, X clarified that only paid users would now be permitted to generate images using Grok, a change intended to enhance accountability. This strategy aims to deter individuals who might misuse the tool for unlawful purposes. The AI’s restrictions are specifically tied to geographic locations, blocking the creation of explicit content in areas where it violates local laws.

While Musk insists that Grok will maintain certain NSFW (not safe for work) features, he reassured the public that under new checks, it would adhere to R-rated standards, varying between regions based on local regulations.

Public and Expert Reactions

Reactions from the expert community have expressed cautious optimism, but with significant reservations. Clare McGlynn, a law professor at Durham University, noted that while X’s new measures are commendable, they come too late for many victims already impacted by the misuse of such technologies. Similarly, Andrea Simon, director of the End Violence Against Women Coalition, emphasized that while X’s response indicates the power of public and governmental pressure, a proactive approach from tech companies is essential to effectively combat AI-generated harms.

Investigations and Future Actions

Ofcom’s investigation into X raises concerns about enforcement and compliance. If X is found in violation, Ofcom could seek court orders to restrict access to the platform altogether within the UK. Prime Minister Starmer has warned that X could lose its “right to self-regulate” if it fails to address these serious allegations thoroughly.

Unresolved Concerns Over Implementation

Despite the announcement of new policies, significant questions remain regarding the practicality of enforcing these changes. Experts like policy researcher Riana Pfefferkorn have pointed out that mechanisms for distinguishing between real and AI-generated images need to be clarified. Concerns also persist regarding users circumventing regulations through VPNs, which allow individuals to mask their geographical location. This leaves significant loopholes for misuse, raising the stakes on how effectively X can implement these new guidelines.

The Road Ahead

As technology continues to advance at a rapid pace, the question remains if platforms like X can adapt to new challenges effectively. The recent outcry over Grok underscores not just a moment of accountability for Elon Musk’s ventures but also a larger conversation about the responsibilities technology companies hold in safeguarding public interests. The outcome of these ongoing investigations may very well shape the future of AI application and regulation for years to come.

Continue Reading

Trending

Discover more from Capitalistic Approach

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading